首页> 外文OA文献 >Is RNA editing implicated in group II intron survival in the angiosperm mitochondrial genome?
【2h】

Is RNA editing implicated in group II intron survival in the angiosperm mitochondrial genome?

机译:RNA编辑是否与被子植物线粒体基因组的II组内含子存活有关?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Introns may be considered as optional because they are removed from mRNA molecules, butintrons are fairly preserved for unknown reasons. Previously, the mitochondrial rps3 gene ofsugar beet (Beta vulgaris L., Caryophyllales) was shown to represent a unique example of anintron loss. We have determined the distribution of the rps3 intron in 19 Caryophyllaleanspecies. The intron was absent from the Amaranthaceae and the Achatocarpaceae. In theCaryophyllaceae, Dianthus japonicus rps3 was pseudogenized but the intronic sequence wasretained. Intact intron-bearing rps3 copies were cloned from Portulaca grandiflora andMyrtillocactus geometrizans, members of the sister clade of theAmaranthaceae-Achatocarpaceae-Caryophyllaceae clade. Most of the C-to-U RNA-editingsites in Portulaca and Myrtillocactus rps3 transcripts were homologous in the two species aswell as in the sugar beet rps3, which, unlike other 12 rps3 transcripts, lacks editing in the exonicregions around the intron. Provided that the loss of editing preceded the loss of rps3 intron, itappears conceivable that a requirement for editing could have prevented the loss of group-IIintrons retained in angiosperm mitochondrial genomes. This interpretation is an alternative tothe conventional one that views the loss of editing as a mere trace of RNA-mediated geneconversion.
机译:内含子可能被认为是可选的,因为它们已从mRNA分子中去除,但是由于未知原因,内含子被保留得相当好。以前,糖用甜菜(Beta vulgaris L.,Caryophyllales)的线粒体rps3基因被证明代表了一个内在子丢失的独特例子。我们已经确定了rps3内含子在19种石竹科植物中的分布。 mar菜科和棘皮科没有内含子。在石竹科中,石竹rps3被假基因化,但内含子序列得以保留。完整的携带内含子的rps3副本从Port菜科-棘皮科-石竹科的姐妹进化枝的成员Portulaca grandiflora和Myrtillocactus geometrizans克隆。 Portulaca和Myrtillocactus rps3转录本中的大多数C-to-U RNA编辑位点在两个物种以及甜菜rps3中都是同源的,与其他12个rps3转录本不同,内含子周围的外显子区域缺乏编辑。假设编辑丢失先于rps3内含子丢失,似乎可以认为编辑要求可以防止被子植物线粒体基因组中保留的II型内含子丢失。这种解释是传统解释的一种替代方法,后者将编辑的丧失视为仅是RNA介导的基因转化的痕迹。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号